(Disclaimer: All opinions stated here are my own and do no imply any official endorsement by the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association)
As I write this the 26th Hyde Park Homes Tour has completed its first day and looks like another success. The Hyde Park Neighborhood Association (HPNA) is highly dependent on a successful Tour each year as its primary fund-raising device. That in turn is dependent on the volunteer planners and workers who turn out each year in large numbers and the homeowners who open their homes to the public. We are grateful to all these folks. There will be more on the Tour in the next issue of the Pecan Press since the deadline for the July edition falls right in the middle of the Tour weekend.
One of the things that has drawn down the Neighborhood Association's funds
during the last year has been legal expenses involved in monitoring
developments involving Hyde Park's largest landowner and its litigation with
the City of Austin.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
There was a recent development in that area when Federal Judge Nowlin threw out the suit filed in his court by the landowner, the Hyde Park Baptist Church (HPBC), against the City and the individual Council Members who voted to deny a permit to construct a second five story parking garage adjacent to the present one. The City had accepted HPNA's argument that the 1990 Agreement between HPNA and HPBC did not waive the limitation inherent in all single family zoning that the maximum percentage of the lot area that can be covered by a building is 40%. While it may seem incredible, part of the site for the proposed parking garage is zoned SF3 and was the site of
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
houses until they were removed. The special City ordinance that was enacted in 1990 specifically to implement the Agreement between the neighborhood and HPBC says that a garage may be erected on ćall or a portion" of the site. HPBC has argued that this wording, which is unique in the multi-volume Land Development Code, nullifies the general provisions applicable to all other single family zoned land not owned by this church. When the City Council withdrew the permit the City staff had issued to build a garage that would have covered nearly all of the site, the church sued in Federal court, alleging many, many violations of everything from the U.S. Constitution to the recently passed Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act. However, when HPBC filed for summary judgment on the case they cited only issues of state, rather than Federal law. Federal Magistrate Austin conducted a hearing and recommended that the case be sent to state court rather than continuing in Federal Court. The most recent and last action to date was a ruling by Federal District Judge Nowlin that accepted this recommendation. What happens next is up to the HPBC leadership. They could appeal or they could file a new suit in state court or choose some other course of action or inaction. To the best of my knowledge, no member of the leadership has contacted any resident of the neighborhood for several months so we will probably read about it in the newspaper when a decision is made. One of the several frustrating things about this long running situation is that there does not appear to be anything that any individual neighbor or the see CO-PRESIDENT on page 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||