Category: News (page 1 of 22)

It’s My Park Day: March 7 9-12

It’s My Park Day is on March 7, 2015 from 9:00 am till 12 noon.

Shipe Park

Each year, thousands of volunteers work to improve Shipe Park and other parks & greenbelts throughout the city.

​”It’s My Park Day” at Shipe Park is organized each ​year by the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association & the Friends of Shipe Park, two neighborhood groups committed to preserving Shipe Park with community building events throughout the year. For more info & Volunteer Registration go to

Give Shipe Park a little TLC! We will be mulching the trees, spreading dillo dirt, cleaning the creek, repainting the benches, picnic tables and trashcans, removing graffiti, removing leaves from the large pool and small pool, adding the gravel back into the swing and playscape area.

​Cool, free t-shirts to all registrants & fun live music & snacks will be provided. See you there !


Letters Dept. – More on HPNA and Inclusivity

I was very glad to see Alejandro Puyana’s opinion piece in January’s Pecan Press (“Is HPNA Inclusive and Democratic”) and read his views about the effect of the neighborhood association’s bylaws on democracy, participation and inclusiveness. I agree with almost everything he had to say; however, I believe overall attitudes and behavior affect inclusiveness and participation issues as much as or more than the bylaws themselves.

Like Mr. Puyana, I also attended the December meeting, witnessed what he described, and overheard others on the sidewalk after the meeting expressing the same views. Although that meeting didn’t differ much from other monthly meetings I’ve attended, I don’t recall ever hearing quite as much dissent and disgust after the meeting. As Mr. Puyana stated, many Hyde Park residents feel shut out of decision-making, for a variety of reasons.

His description of the current HPNA decision makers as old guard and their allies is useful; and so for the purpose of this discussion, I’d like to adopt that term, abbreviating it as OG. And for want of a better term, to distinguish the amorphous group not so aligned with it, I shall designate as other members (OMs). The lines between them are sometimes blurry and do not correspond to the length of time one has lived in the neighborhood. I myself have owned a home in Hyde Park for more than 20 years, have lived in “the hood” for longer than that, and have fought alongside and supported the OG on several issues over the years; but sometimes even I feel like an OM and an outsider when condescended to by the OG.

Although I try to keep current on neighborhood issues and communicate with my own neighbors, I do not regularly attend monthly meetings: I find them tedious at best, and an unhealthy dose of snark at worst. But I force myself to attend at least every few months, especially if the agenda includes voting. True to form, the meeting and discussion that night (specifically, the discussion regarding the requested zoning and repurposing of the house at 45th and Speedway) was pretty much par for the course.

I was pleased to notice so many OMs in attendance that night. Like many of them, I saw the idea of the café as a plus for our neighborhood. But of course the OG had a different opinion; and, as usual, they prevailed. The OG did make some good arguments against the zoning request, but what I object to is the tone in which those arguments were made. As Mr. Puyana noted in his letter, the attitude that the OG projects is that any change is bad and “get off my lawn.” And even if that isn’t always the case, what I witnessed that night was the all-too-familiar attitude of smugness and “you just don’t know what you’re talking about, but we do, and so we’re right and you’re wrong.”

As someone who feels she can see both sides of this divide, I’d like to address each group separately in what follows.

To OMs: First, thank you for coming out to support Tony Hooman, the owner of the property in question, and your idea for change in the “hood.” Even though you felt shut out and overpowered that night, please don’t let that stop you from continuing to come out again in the future to make your voices heard, to participate, to serve on committees, and even to change the bylaws if necessary. Whatever you do, do not allow yourself to fall prey to the same “snark” that the OG often relies on. If you do succumb, you become one of them (it’s too late for me, but save yourselves).

At the same time, please keep the big picture in mind. Recognize that many of the good things about this neighborhood exist thanks to the efforts of the OG. If they had not dug in their heels and fought the good fight over many years, Hyde Park would not be the neighborhood that drew you here in the first place. It long ago would have been bulldozed and replaced with something much less unique and inviting. So, yes, perhaps they often seem adverse to even small changes that they see as perhaps leading to more drastic, undesirable changes; but whenever you have the chance, please thank a member of the OG for what they’ve done so far on your behalf.

To the OG: First, thank you for the years of hard work, long hours, and sometimes thankless commitment to preserve the neighborhood as we know it. Many of you actually accomplish your goals with grace and respect.

But some of you do not and you need to lose the attitude, or at least dial back the snark. Please stop patronizing your own neighbors and being so dismissive of their views. My husband and I used to volunteer for neighborhood committees and projects, but dropped out along the way because of all the snarkiness, even among people who largely agree with each other. We now direct our volunteer efforts elsewhere.

Next, please choose your battles more carefully.  The current campaign to “Keep 45th St. Residential” seems tone deaf and weak.  Many businesses are currently located on 45th St.  The house in question, in fact, faces Speedway.  Perhaps “Keep Speedway Residential” might have resonated a little more clearly.

And finally, I would say to the OG, stop undermining your own efforts.  During monthly meetings, please don’t always be poised to shoot down anyone opposed to your ideas. Sit down and really listen to your neighbors, including the OMs. It doesn’t help the neighborhood to replace actual bulldozers with human bulldozers. What will we have really gained if we don’t maintain a sense of community and a sense of camaraderie? So, enough already.

–Janet Risovi

Avenue F






Sunshine Community Gardens Sale – March 7, 2015

30,000 Hard to find Certified Organic Tomato and Wicked Hot/Sweet Bell Pepper Plants, Herbs go on sale March 7, 2015.


Austin’s most loved, locally raised heirloom veggies and herbs make their big debut 9 A.M. at Sunshine Community Gardens, March 7. The largest Certified Organic Non-Profit Plant sale in Texas includes 150 Tomato varieties, 72 Wicked Hot and Sweet Bell Pepper varieties, 15 kinds of Eggplants, and thousands of herbs ready for spring planting.


The first bite of a delicious and juicy home grown organic tomato will make you beg for more. Improve your health with regular gardening exercise. Save big money by growing your own organic vegetables. A complete list of plants on sale and varieties to grow for the Austin area go to Sunshine Community Gardens.


For a Fun-Filled day, come early, Learn organic gardening practices. Talk with Vendors. Listen to Live Music.


Walk the 180 gardens. Kids love to visit the Chicken Coop. Purchase Lady Bug compost for your plants too!

Exploring Lives – Interview with Dorothy Richter

Editor’s Note: Born in 1921 and affectionately known as the “Mayor of Hyde Park”, Dorothy Richter is only months away from celebrating her 50th year as a resident. While her activism extends well beyond the borders of this neighborhood, it would be no exaggeration to say that Hyde Park would not be anything like it is today without her efforts and accomplishments. Her extraordinary successes in citizen action reminded this editor of Jean Merrill’s The Pushcart War, the fictional tale of how the traditional pushcart vendors of New York’s Lower East Side, against all odds and through collaborative non-violent action, defeated the big Mack Trucks and their allies at city hall who were trying to drive them off the streets and in the process destroy their livelihoods.


Pecan Press: You grew up in the depression in rural Texas. What was that like?

Dorothy Richter:   For one thing, Stockdale, where I was born, had no electricity until 1926. We relied on wood stove and fireplace. Wagons and mules were used to haul produce. While I was growing up, though, improvements were occurring. In addition to electricity, we got some paved roads.

I wasn’t really aware of the depression, perhaps because people were so poor to begin with.   On the other hand, my family did seem to have more privileges and money. I had a Shetland pony and a bicycle. My father was a county commissioner and a rancher

PP: You have become a force to be reckoned with in defending causes you take up. Any inklings of that as you were growing up?

DR: I’m not sure why, but from early on I didn’t like to see anybody bullied. I guess it offended my sense of fairness or justice. Because of a misalignment of her spine, my cousin had to undergo surgery that resulted in a humped back and small size. People made fun of her, especially this group of boys. I remember two incidents. As we were standing in line at school, one larger boy was bothering my cousin. When I jumped out of line towards him, he ran. I am right behind him and beat him with a stick that I had picked up. He didn’t fight back.

On another occasion when we were coming back from an Easter Egg hunt, these five bullies started to bother my cousin again. In running after them, I threw eggs and hit the ring leader in the back of his head. It made a real mess. The egg was not hard-boiled.   They threatened me, but never did anything, perhaps because I was popular, good at sports, and captain of a team. After these incidents, my cousin was much better treated.


PP: When you were young, did you desire to pursue a particular career?

DR: In those days, about the only careers open to a girl were to be a teacher, nurse, or secretary. Me, I wanted to be a vet. I loved animals, felt protective toward them. Still do. From early on, I raised and took care of birds that were injured. I was also inspired by my uncle who functioned as the town vet. But A&M, the only vet school in Texas, didn’t take girls.

PP: That was a significant limitation on you as a girl. Anything else in your upbringing that worked against or for you as a girl?

DR: I was driven to do my best. In retrospect, as an only child, I think I sensed that my father would have preferred to have a boy to carry on the family name. I compensated for that by trying to be the best in whatever I did.

PP: So what was your back-up career plan?

DR: I liked home economics in high school and was actually chosen to compete at the state level for dress design. So I went to college at Southwest Texas Teachers College [now known as Texas State] to become a home economics teacher. That’s where I met my husband Walter, whom I married in 1941. I worked for a short time as a teacher, but during the war mostly helped my uncle in his drugstore.

PP: Your husband became a state senator in 1963. What did you think about that?

DR: I didn’t really want that. Not sure why. I didn’t say no, but did tell him that I wasn’t going to help. As it turned out, his opponent came up with some untruths about him and I got really mad at the injustice of it all. I then worked on some projects that helped him get elected.

PP: It’s hard to imagine you just playing the role of a politician’s wife.

DR: I was happy for him that he won but I just didn’t like always getting invited to this or that event. I hated when people were lined up to shake hands. You had to say you were glad to meet these folks, but I wasn’t and didn’t like not being truthful. I hated to dress up, and those terrible pointed shoes you had to wear!

PP: Did your husband ever try to rein you in?

DR: He never complained about anything I ever did. No other man would have put up with me like that. He sort of had me on a pedestal.

PP: Was it then that smoking started to be an issue for you?

DR: Yes, I was really bothered by all the smoke I had to endure at those political meetings and events.   It made me sick. Everybody smoked. This was an injustice, I thought at the time. Not fair to me. These people are doing something that is messing with my health.

PP: So what did you do about it?

DR: I started to be outspoken at places where people smoked. I’m sure I embarrassed my family on many an occasion. I remember once telling Price Daniels he couldn’t get into our car if was going to puff on that cigar of his. After persistent complaints, I got Green Pastures to agree to make one room a non-smoking room. Eventually I founded Texans United for the Rights of Non-Smokers in the early 70s. Through its efforts—and this is something I’m very proud of—a state law was passed, the first one in the country that outlawed smoking in some public places.

PP: His senate seat was in Gonzales. Why did you move to Austin and Hyde Park?

DR: Our son was very talented on the piano. A UT professor of graduate students training to be concert pianists had agreed to be my son’s piano teacher for free. And just by chance, a suitable house in Hyde Park was for sale.

PP: How many children did you have?

DR: Two. My son still plays the piano, but eventually decided to go in a different direction. He’s now a professor of mathematics at Southwestern, right here in Georgetown. My daughter is a teacher of EMS at Austin Community College. I chose not to work out of the house after the war. I don’t think there’s anything more important than a mother who stays home to take care of her children.

PP: Why didn’t your husband continue his senate career in Austin?

DR: There wasn’t an opportunity at the time; and besides, we thought his income would be too low to meet family needs if he stayed in the senate. An opportunity did occur later on in 1973 when Walter announced his candidacy for an open senate seat. At that time, a young Lloyd Doggett was wanting to enter into state politics. After a visit from him, I convinced Walter to withdraw his candidacy, and thus Doggett’s political career was launched.

PP: Hyde Park must certainly have been different when you arrived in the mid-60s. What most comes to mind about it?

DR: At first I didn’t pay much attention, but the neighborhood was a mess. The houses were run down, yards were not kept up, the city had designated the area for student housing.

PP: So what sparked your interest in getting involved in Hyde Park issues?

DR: Well, it just sort of happened.   I first got involved with the Shipe House right across the street from me at 39th and G. It was in bad shape and was probably a drug house. Someone from the city who was taking a picture said they wanted to change the zoning and build student apartments. And for some reason I didn’t like that idea. When I don’t like something, you better watch out and get out of my way.

I knew nothing about zoning. A neighbor and I hired a lawyer. I did a survey of neighbors in the immediate area; a lot of them didn’t think having a bunch of students on the corner would be a good idea. At a Planning Commission meeting, I was designated to speak out against the zoning proposal. I was successful enough there that the proposal never made it to Council.

From that point on, I was focused on neighborhood issues. I boned up on zoning issues, and learned how to fight zoning changes that go from single-family to multiple family. I trained people on how to fight those changes and sign petitions. In the early 80s I won a seat on the city’s Board of Adjustment, where I had a great deal to say and a lot of influence about zoning issues throughout Austin.

PP: Can you name 3 or 4 of your accomplishments in Hyde Park that you feel are particularly important?

DR: Saving our neighborhood fire station was of course a big one. And later on, a major tree preservation ordinance resulted from my standing in the way of bulldozers to save a tree at the fire station. I also cherish my role in preventing the demolition of the Barker House, the beautiful 2-story brick home with white columns that sits near Hyde Park on Duval.

Some other accomplishments were ensuring there were sufficient restrictions on what could be developed on the vacant lot covering a whole block at Avenue H and 41st and keeping the post office from moving out of Hyde Park.

PP: You were active in issues in other parts of the city, too. Can you talk about that a bit?

DR: I was involved in efforts to ensure that our state capitol remained visible from major roadways. And I became active in Barton Creek protests. I was the first to join a group to fight zoning changes there, and later fought development of the Barton Springs Mall. I was a daily swimmer at the springs, and it really upset me that I could no longer see my hand in the water because of construction of the mall. To this day, I’ve never spent a dime in any of those stores. In all my protests it took others to help. I couldn’t have done anything by myself.

PP: You’ve seen a lot of changes in Austin, including its rapid growth. How do you view these changes?

DR: Naturally I am not happy with these changes. I thought Austin was pretty nice as it was—it had a capitol, a river, a university. We’ve grown too fast, and now we just have sprawl. Mansions are springing up because of the technology boom. I wouldn’t even know how to live in those places. Maybe we’re living on quicksand. What if our boom goes bust, and we’ll have all this expensive infrastructure but no funds to maintain it.

PP: You’ve won quite a few awards in your lifetime. What recognition has meant the most to you?

DR: The most recent one, my induction into the Women’s Hall of Fame, was very important to me. It seemed to sum up everything I’ve done. What affected me the most, though, was all the people who made such an effort to come to the ceremony to honor me. Even my yard man showed up, looking dapper.

PP: It’s hard to imagine you just sitting back relaxing even in your 90’s. Any plans for the future?

DR: I’m still working for change. For the last four years I’ve been agitating to get rid of daylight savings time in Texas. It’s not healthy, and it’s no longer needed for energy reasons. I introduced a resolution at the precinct level, hand out stickers, and everywhere wear my “Don’t Mess with my Body Clock—One Time for Texas” sweatshirt. I’ve heard a rally is being planned in Austin. We’ll see what happens.


Opinion: Is HPNA Inclusive and Democratic?

The Hyde Park Neighborhood Associations has a lot of power—don’t let them tell you otherwise. The city officials and staff pay attention to what gets voted on by HPNA.

Anyone who was present at last month’s meeting could see that. Austin’s two remaining mayoral candidates, Mike Martinez and Steve Adler, gushed over what they considered “democracy in action,” with more than 60 neighbors crowded into the Griffin School auditorium having a lively debate on important neighborhood issues. During the candidates’ remarks, they repeated time and again that neighborhoods should be left to make decisions on what is best for them, and that the city needs to listen.

I agree with that last sentiment, but do not agree that what our esteemed mayoral candidates witnessed was in fact democracy in action. What they did not see is that HPNA is beset by inclusiveness and participation issues.  From what I have observed so far, the decision-making process at HPNA is confined to a tight group of regulars whose philosophy basically boils down to this: Change of any kind is considered bad (with a healthy dose of “get off my lawn” thrown in).

Taken as a whole, HPNA bylaw provisions seem to ensure that an old guard and their allies come out ahead on all votes. Here are the facts on the bylaws. Meetings are held once a month; and in order to vote, you have to be present. Online voting, or early/delayed voting are not allowed. So it’s tough luck if you couldn’t find a baby sitter, or you’re at work late, or you have a family emergency. You do not have a vote. Also, we have a thriving small business community that the neighborhood depends on; but unless you also reside in Hyde Park, as a business owner you do not have a vote. And if you own property in Hyde Park, but you do not reside here (even though your livelihood might depend on the neighborhood), you do not have a vote.

Another significant feature of the bylaws that hinders inclusiveness, and has affected me personally, is the 30-day waiting period. This provision disenfranchises neighbors of their voice. While the bylaws make a member wait 30 days after paying dues in order to be able to cast a vote, these same bylaws only mandate the association inform the neighborhood of upcoming votes 7 days prior to a meeting, making it impossible for non-member neighbors interested in voting on an issue to have their opinions counted.

There are some valid arguments against some or all of the points I am raising, and they need to be discussed. Inclusiveness, however, must also be a part of that discussion. But it hasn’t been. In fact, it was reported to me that when someone brought up the issue of inclusiveness at a recent Steering Committee meeting, the reply from a long-standing member was, “HPNA bylaws specifically do not require that the association represent the interests of Hyde Park residents.”

Let me give you a second to let that sink in.

An organization that calls itself a neighborhood association—that makes recommendations (most of the time adopted) to the people that decide the fate of the city—actually admits that it holds no desire to represent our interests. And it’s true: its bylaws do not require it to do so. And they do not require it to make efforts to increase participation.

That’s just not right. As decisions are being made, hundreds and hundreds of Hyde Park residents are not part of the decision-making process.

The first step to addressing this problem is to admit that there is one. So far, I don’t think any HPNA officials have done so.  As a homeowner in Hyde Park, and as a brand-spanking-new-dues-paying-member of HPNA, I hope that discussion starts pronto (but hopefully in more than 30 days so I can actually cast a vote).

–Alejandro Puyana





Holiday Spirits Not Dampened by Rain

Although the weather presented some last minute challenges, it definitely did not deter neighbors from sharing cheer at the traditional Hyde Park Holidays Party.

The rain did, however, force a change of venue. And so, very pecial thanks is owed to Adam and Caroline Wilson for generously stepping in with very little notice, opening up the Griffin School to the community for this event. Not only that, they were extraordinarily helpful in setting up and cleaning up the space, making available whatever was needed for the evening. Many thanks are also due to the staff at the Elisabet Ney, preparing for the party at the museum up to the last minute change of venue.

Attendees were warmly welcomed to the event by greeters at the membership table, where we were reminded of the benefits of being part of the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association. Moving into the kitchen, one discovered nibbles provided by Antonelli’s Cheese Shop, along with delectable cookies from Cookie Peace and scrumptious hot cocoa from the Chocolate Maker’s Studio. Kids watched a family movie in one of the classrooms, or played outside on the wide lawn when there was respite from the rain.

Guests then made their way into the library/common area, which was beautifully decorated: lighted paper stars hung from the vaulted ceiling, tea lights twinkled from the tables and windows, and fragrant garlands and oranges with cloves added scents of the season. At the stage in front of the room, violinist Laura Poyzer and cellist Amy Diehl entertained the guests, as kids played on the steps before them.

Although the “Wish Tree” was stationed at the Elisabet Ney Museum, the wish tag tradition started by Nancy Mims was continued from last year, where guests were invited to create a “wish” which would be placed on the tree. A common theme was “I wish for racial harmony” or “I wish for peace and happiness for all.” There were also practical requests such as “I wish that I pass all my finals,” and whimsical ones like “I wish I could fly.”   The wish tags are hung on the tree at the Ney through New Year’s.

As always, a theme of the evening was helping others, especially those in our own community. During the evening, over $350 in monetary gifts and donations were collected, along with many toys, all of which was donated to the Helping Hands Home, which is located in Hyde Park. This nonprofit organization strives tirelessly to make life better for the children in its care.   The gifts and donations were dropped off the next day and they were thrilled!

The evening would not have been possible without the team of volunteers. Led by the inspiring Tammy Young, the committee of Nancy Mims, Susie Roselle, Nhaila Hendrickse, Samantha Constant and Amy Diehl found time in their own busy holiday schedules to make this party happen. Hearty thanks also go out to the volunteers who greeted, set up at the beginning and cleaned up at the end.

It was a perfect way for neighbors to celebrate the holidays together and mark the transition from 2014 to 2015.

–Angeline Tucker




HPNA Meeting Minutes – December 2014

HPNA Meeting Minutes: December 1, 2014

The meeting was called to order at 7:11 p.m. by Kevin Heyburn, co-president. In opening remarks, Kevin introduced the various officers, welcomed everyone and particularly encouraged those who were not regular attendees to attend future meetings.

The agenda was announced. The two specific resolutions that needed to be acted upon were (1) a re-vote on the resolution regarding ADUs (the new vote was necessary because in the previous month the agenda had not been posted to the bulletin board at Fresh Plus, a technical violation of the bylaws) and (2) a vote on resolutions regarding the proposed restaurant (and associated zoning changes) at 4500 Speedway. In addition, all were invited to the HPNA Holidays Party, to take place on December 14 at the Ney Museum. At a later point, it was announced that early voting had begun and that the dates for the Contact Team and the Steering Committee meetings were Dec. 2 and Dec. 8 respectively.

ADU Resolution

The proposed resolution was as follows: “City Council resolutions concerning Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) should not override the neighborhood planning process or neighborhood plans. Therefore the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association does not support a city-wide or blanket policy change pertaining to the construction of ADUs, such as resolution #20140612-062 passed by the City Council on June 12, 2014. We see our neighborhood plan, which grew out of a process of civic participation, as central to maintaining the character and the quality of life of our neighborhood.”

It was mentioned in advance that the resolution was open to amendment but not substitution. Despite that, a substitute motion in support of the city ADU resolution was proposed and considered. There was a vote taken, with 59 opposing and 12 favoring the substitute resolution.

As the meeting then returned to the business of the original resolution, there was a proposal to amend, retaining only the first sentence since city staff had yet to come back with details. This amendment was rejected by a vote of more than 40 to 6.

Then the resolution as originally offered was brought to a vote, with 59 favoring and 17 opposing.

4500 Speedway Resolutions

The two resolutions under consideration were (1) “The Hyde Park Neighborhood Association does not support the zoning change and the changes to the neighborhood plan” and (2) “The Hyde Park Neighborhood Association supports the restaurant with minimal zoning changes.”

A proposed amendment to add the words “and NCCD” to the end of the resolution (1) was accepted.

After much back and forth about the relative advantages and disadvantages of accepting resolution (1), a vote took place. The amended resolution read as follows: “The Hyde Park Neighborhood Association does not support the zoning change and the changes to the neighborhood plan and NCCD. This resolution passed, with 47 favoring and 28 opposing.

Mayoral Forum        

Mr. Adler went first on the basis of a coin toss. His opening statement included the information that he had lived in Austin since 1978, some of that time in Hyde Park. He noted the spirit of Austin and that he was running for mayor to preserve what he felt made it special. He noted in particular two issues: property values that have been growing well ahead of incomes and transportation challenges. Zoning and inequality in general were also noted as being important.

Mr. Martinez remarked that this was a particularly important election due to the move to single member districts and that institutional knowledge would be specifically important during this transition. He also mentioned that he would not revisit closing Firehouse No. 9 or ADUs; local input was important. Issues should go in the direction wanted by “regular people.”

A lively question and answer period followed.

The meeting was then adjourned around 9 p.m.

–Submitted by Artie Gold and Reid Long, HPNA Co-Secretaries


Fire Station Festival 2014 Pictures

Lizzie Chen - Fire Station Festival 2014

Photo Credits: Lizzie Chen

Bill McCullough - Fire Station Festival 2014

Photo Credits: Bill McCullough

Deaton Bednar - Fire Station Festival 2014

Photo Credits: Deaton Bednar

Kailey Griffin - Fire Station Festival 2014

Photo Credits: Kailey Griffin

Suzanna Griffin - Fire Station Festival 2014

Photo Credits: Suzanna Griffin

Victoria Goodman - Fire Station Festival 2014

Photo Credits: Victoria Goodman

Window on Hyde Park

This haunted house was just one of many that dotted the streets of Hyde Park this Halloween. Decked out in costumes of all sorts, hundreds and hundreds of children and their families from Hyde Park and around the city took to neighborhood streets as “trick or treaters” on a beautiful fall evening. The biggest throngs were to be seen along Avenues F and G. If one tried to drive a car anywhere near there on Halloween, the goblins probably got the driver, passengers, and the automobile too.

Hyde Park Halloween House

Voting Matters at December 1, 2014 HPNA Meeting

At the HPNA general meeting on December 1, 2014, the following resolutions will be voted on. The first two resolutions concern proposed zoning change to allow a restaurant at 4500 Speedway. The third resolutions concern City resolutions regarding accessory dwelling units. A vote on this third resolution occurred at the November meeting, but later was declared invalid because the resolution was not posted in all required venues. (This third resolution was also up for a vote at a special called meeting of the Contact Team on November 17.)

In order to vote, one must be a dues-paid member of HPNA for a period of 30 days before the vote takes place.

Resolution One

The Hyde Park Neighborhood Association does not support the zoning change and the changes to the neighborhood plan.

Resolution Two

The Hyde Park Neighborhood Association supports the restaurant with minimal zoning changes.

Resolution Three

City Council resolutions concerning Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) should not override the neighborhood planning process or neighborhood plans.  Therefore the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association does not support a city-wide or blanket policy change pertaining to the construction of ADUs, such as resolution #20140612-062 passed by the City Council on June 12, 2014.  We see our neighborhood plan, which grew out of a process of civic participation, as central to maintaining the character and the quality of life of our neighborhood.

Older posts